Agrovista-Farming

Smart/Precision Farming is Swiftly Making the Farms More “Intelligent”

Smart/Precision Farming is Swiftly Making the Farms More "Intelligent"

Precision Farming

Precision agriculture using sensing technologies is swiftly gaining popularity

The world’s population is increasing by around three people every second, or 240,000 people every day. According to the UN Population Portal, approximately 8.2 billion people are going to exist on the globe. by the end of 2025 and 9.7 billion people by 2050.

This implies that for the next few years, there will be an additional billion mouths to feed. Additionally, the global population is expected to surpass that of the early 1900s in just one generation. 

The challenges are enormous since many of the resources required for sustained food security are already overextended. Meanwhile, both locally and worldwide, agricultural production is already being adversely affected by factors like; 

Farms need to produce more food while protecting the environment, but they can’t accomplish this with the conventional agricultural methods of today.

Precision / Smart Agriculture ;

Technologies used for Precision Farming ;

The development and implementation of precision agriculture, also known as site-specific farming, has been made possible by combining these two systems.

a) Global Positioning System (GPS)

b) Geographic information systems (GIS).

a) Uses of Global Positioning System (GPS) in Agriculture ;

ISRO: GPS Over India Designed Image credit: Sand prints

b) Importance of Geographic Information System (GIS) in Agriculture;

c) Uses of Remote Sensing technology in Precision Farming;

d) Smartphone-Based  Sensors ;

e) Uses of Robotics / Drones in Agriculture ;

f)  Irrigation Technologies for Precision/ Smart Farming ;

g) Internet of Things  (IoT) uses in Agriculture ;

 

h) Sensors used in Agriculture ;

 i) Variable Rate Seeding ;

 j) Weather Modelling Techniques ;

k)  Nitrogen Modelling ;

Precision Farming key challenges ;

a) Improving GNSS Signal Availability;

GLONASS functionality is currently available on the majority of high-precision systems supplied in North America to supplement GPS for signal availability. More growers will see GNSS as a dependable answer to their problems as more satellite signals in orbit become available, improving availability in these challenging conditions.

b) Interoperability of different standards;

Interoperability is quickly becoming a challenge as more and more OEMs develop cutting-edge agricultural IoT tools and platforms. The different tools and technologies that are offered frequently do not adhere to the same platforms and technical standards, which causes a lack of consistency in the end users’ final analyses. For the translation and transfer of data across standards, the establishment of an additional gateway or gateways becomes crucial in many cases. Even while precision agriculture is developing quickly, it is still largely dispersed as of right now.

Converting intelligent standalone devices and gateways into comprehensive, farmer-friendly platforms is the difficult part. Component compatibility across equipment manufacturers is still being demanded, mostly through ISOBUS standards. The Agricultural Industry Electronics Foundation was established approximately a few years ago as the first official attempt to put this into practice. More than 170 businesses, associations, and organizations are currently part of the group and actively working together to make the standards function.

c) Making sense from big data in agriculture;

There are literally millions of data points on a contemporary, networked farm. However, managing and tracking every single data point and reading on a daily or weekly basis over the full growth season is nearly impossible (and not required).

When there are several growing seasons and extensive, multi-crop areas, the issue is especially severe. Farmers must determine which data layers and points they must regularly monitor and which data “noise” they can afford to overlook. Big data is driving digital agriculture more and more, but the technology is only useful when users can “make sense” of the information that is accessible.

d) Size of individual management zones;

Farmers have historically viewed their entire fields as a single farming unit. However, such strategy is far from being successful when it comes to managing and applying IoT in agriculture. Users must separate their properties into a number of smaller “management zones,” and there is considerable disagreement about the “appropriate” size of these zones. The zones must be separated according to the needs for fertilizer and soil sample (various zones have varied soil quality). The total size of the growing area should determine the number of zones and their sizes on a field. When farmers attempt to divide their farms in these zones, there is a dearth of reference material for them to use. Instead, many farmers continue to use the same irrigation and/or fertilization techniques across the entire farm, which produces less than ideal outcomes.

e) Non-awareness of the varying farm production functions;

In-depth economic analysis needs to complement internet tools, to ensure higher yields on farms. Users need to be able to define the correct production function (output as a function of key inputs, like nutrients, fertilizers, irrigation, etc.). Typically, the production function is not the same for all crops, differs in the various zones of a farm, and also changes over the crop/plant-growth cycle. Unless the farmer is aware of this varying production function, there will always remain the chance of application of inputs in incorrect amounts (spraying too much of nitrogen fertilizer, for example) – resulting in crop damage. Precision agriculture is all about optimizing output levels by making the best use of the available, limited inputs – and for that, the importance of following the production function is immense.

f) Barriers to entry for new firms;

Although precision farming has been a subject of considerable interest for several years now, the concept is still relatively ‘new’. As such, the big hardware/software manufacturers that entered this market at an early stage still have a definite ‘first-mover advantage’. The low competitiveness of the market can prevent new firms from entering this domain, with the existing big firms retaining a stranglehold.

Farmers can also face problems while trying to migrate data streams from an older platform to a newer one, and there are risks of data loss. The platforms and resources offered by a major agro-IoT operator may not be compatible with those of a smaller OEM, which could hinder the latter’s ability to attract enough customers.

Conclusion ;

 
Exit mobile version